Saturday, December 6, 2008

Alberta’s Free Medical


Here’s another example of breaking down stereotypes and the benefits of fiscal responsibility. Alberta is a wealthy province. Mostly because of the oil but it goes beyond that. No sales tax, less government, balanced budgets, the list goes on. As a result their economy prospers. So what do they do? They turn around and give everyone free medical. To the left that would be an oxymoron. Conservatives supporting free medical. Yet if you step outside the box, logic dictates that fiscal responsibility is the key to social prosperity.

Diversity makes us strong



We had our diversity training at work the other day. This was long after we had our legal training on sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace course. This went beyond that and was much more positive. The intent was to avoid conflict and lawsuits in the workplace before they happened by changing the way we see the differences in each other and foster respect for different opinions.

The training material was from coastal dot com:
http://coastal.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34984
That’s coastal not postal.

I actually enjoyed it. I did think it was a bit funny at first. We’re all sitting around the table in the boardroom and I read the first question on the survey they handed out. "If you could be a tree what type would you be?" What the hell is this I thought to myself. The next question was "What vegetable in the diversity soup would you be?" Then "If they made a movie about your life, what character would play you and why?"

I thought to myself you have got to be kidding. They are taking us away from work to talk about obscure touchy feelie things? Why? I asked if this was like the "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" kind of things and my supervisor sitting beside me chuckled. He said the character that would play him was a cross between Homer Simpson and Brad Pitt. I really like and respect him.

There are two points I’d like to make. One is about the training and the other is about my new employer and my new workplace. Canada Post would never take the time to do something like this. Neither would TELUS. They would only fulfill their legal obligations by defining legal discrimination. TELUS only did that to hide and prevent being sued over the sexual harassment displayed in TELUS Idol. They gave the employees sexual harassment training when they should have given it to the CEO who was the one responsible for promoting the sexual harassment displayed in TELUIS Idol.

The only training that Canada Post gives is passionate brainwashing why the Union is bad and why the Corporation is good. Their training is diametrically opposed to the fundamental basis of diversity training. Theirs is a petty power struggle to prove we are good and they are bad. The other is a power sharing thought process encouraging people to see the value in diversity.

Moya Greene is the epitome of this extreme. Not only does she refuse to listen to her employees or the union, she also refuses to listen to most of her managers. She goes on record to say that the private sector thinks public sector managers are stupid and don’t know anything. Then she complains in her submission to the mandate review that there is an "internal management culture of risk aversion". It is unwise for someone with no successful experience in a service based industry to conclude all her managers and employees who have been in the industry for 20 years are stupid.


When asked to list all the various differences in our society and workplace the facilitator said what about management and employees? Those are differences. As a manager I know sometimes I feel a difference between us and head office. Doesn’t the same apply to employees and managers in the workplace? Some of us shrugged and said I guess so we added it to the list but I will tell you one thing. The management worker barrier is not nearly the same at my new employer as it is with Canada Post or TELUS.

They key to the difference is that my new employer hires from within. Canada Post and TELUS does not. Not any more. In my workplace my supervisor knows my job and can do it better than I can because they have done it for 15 yeas. At Canada Post or TELUS you have someone with no idea how to do the job literally bossing someone around who has been in the industry for many years.

The perfect example of this starts right at the top with Moya Greene. She has no idea how to do the job. She feels insecure so she fires all her managers who know how to do the job and promotes managers with classroom experience on management only. The same at Telus. Darren Entwistle is doing his best to remove skilled labour from the workplace by ending apprenticeships. If that is not the recipe for disaster I don't know what is.

The primary objective of my new employer is to make a profit just as it is at Canada Post and TELUS. Only they have two completely different approaches to obtaining that objective and if you look at the stock and the profit margins my new employer is much more successful at obtaining that objective. A happy workforce is a productive workforce. Indeed "Canada Post will profit from labour peace." Dale Clark


Friday, December 5, 2008

Harper’s Shame



Harper’s only shame is that he has no shame. Just like his idol Brian Mulroney. Harper pulls another dirty trick just like Mulroney did. Mulroney found an obscure legal loophole to appoint extra senators to stack the senate and ram the GST through. That was not democratic. That was not fiscally responsible. That was not noble. It was an example of how the conservatives talk the talk but they do not walk the walk of democracy. Democracy means listening to the constituents not railroading them. Kind of like what Harper did with David Emerson. It is a repeating precedent.

Harper closing parliament for six weeks just prolongs the inevitable. What we have here is a minority government. Whenever this happens, the party who gets the most seats must team up with one of the other parties and form a government. Harper never did that. Either time. Instead the rude cat calling arrogance typical of a majority government prevailed as he persisted to flame the other parties in the house.

Harper failed to form a coalition to form a minority government. There is nothing stopping the other parties to pool their seats and assume the role of government. Nothing. And as I said before I do think it’s rather humorous.

The Conservatives did come out hard painting Dion as an idiot. I don’t know much about Dion other than he can’t speak English very well. However, he can speak English better than I can speak French and better than Harper can speak French. Personally I don’t care what language he speaks. French, Mandarin, Punjabi…
.
My beef with Dion was him resorting to the Conservatives mud slinging over crime. He sent out a flyer saying Harper is wrong on crime then walks out on the vote when Harper tries to introduce a bill addressing crime. We need to rise above the pettiness. They all do.

There might well have been something wrong with Harper’s crime bill. We asked for minimum sentences for violent crime and he proposes minimum sentences for the possession of Marijuana. From one extreme to the other with out addressing the issue we needed to address, violent crime.

I do prefer Dion to Paul Martin. There was something about Martin that I just didn’t trust. Maybe it was Buz the snake Hargrove. I didn’t like how the Liberals screwed the TWU in their dispute with TELUS’ offshore call centres. Then again it turned out the TWU was screwed by Bruce Bell and Buzz Hargrove who turned down a special mediator so maybe it wasn’t the Liberals fault.

The Liberals did come out with a good web site comparing Harper’s goals to George Bush. It is no secret Harper drooled over the thought of meeting not to mention following Bush. That is a colossal red flag. Harper would have followed the States into Iraq based on a lie. That would have been criminal. Cretchien may have been bad with money but not invading Iraq was one thing he did right. http://www.thestar.com/FederalElection/article/509958



My concern with Harper and with Martin is their position on the North American Union. Throwing away the constitution and the Charter of Rights and replacing them with TILMA a trade agreement that opens Pandora’s box by making it illegal for any government to create any law that would inhibit a corporation’s ability to make a profit. When you think about the seriousness of the ramifications of that, it’s simply mind boggling.

The Coalition isn’t just Dion. Dion has to get agreement from the NDP and the Bloc on issues, which keeps him in line. As a result the Liberal's carbon tax was axed. The NDP and the Bloc are the only ones other than the Green Party, which has expressed any concern about the wording of the North American Secret Union deal. That is a huge election issue.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

The New Coalition



Well this made my day. There is nothing, I repeat nothing stopping the other political parties in a minority government teaming up and forming a coalition. It is not a conspiracy nor is it undemocratic. It is the natural consequence of arrogance.

We don’t have the two party system in Canada which is a good thing. As Jesse Ventura stated the two party system just gives you one more choice than Communist Russia.

I totally supported the Reform party. Balance the budget to save social programs not eliminate them. They stood apart from Mulroney’s pork barrel politics and said look beyond the left and right. Three cheers. Then came unite the right instead of unite the bright and that vision was lost. Reform merged with the Conservatives and dejavu Mulronism was back in black.

I tell ya what it’s about, it’s about arrogance. Harper wasted all that money on another election because he wanted a free license to "govern." Somehow the way he says that, it sounds an awful lot like a monarchy. That’s the problem with a majority government, they steam roll ahead with their extreme agenda and don’t listen to a word anyone else says. The Conservatives wanted to "govern" so they could do whatever they wanted whenever they wanted without listening to a word from the opposition.

I tell ya why I’m thrilled with the new coalition and why I’m concerned. I’m thrilled because it’s about time the other political parties teamed up on anything. Getting rid of the Liberal’s carbon tax proposal is good. Protecting pensions is good. Spending money indiscriminately is bad but the conservatives are no better with money. They just spend it on different things and oppress and exploit the elderly and disabled while they do it.

I really take offense to the conservative’s mud slinging stereotypes. "And the new socialist-separatist driven coalition is an attack on Canada itself." STFU! If caring for the elderly and disabled is socialism then I am a socialist so stfu. Look at Gordon Campbell in BC. He shuts down Riverview, puts all the mentally ill on the street then gives himself a huge pay raise and gold plated pension. The very pension he was elected campaigning against. Then he gives himself another obscene raise and puts all the seniors on the street. That is satanic. Stop calling that godly and stop saying anyone who objects is a socialist. Have you no self respect?!

The Bloc does not want to destroy Canada. They want to rule themselves. Just like Ireland wanted. However, just like Northern Ireland, it is problematic because just over 50% don’t want to separate. So why do they elect a separatist government if they don’t all want to separate? Because they want to put their goals as a province first just like every other province wants. That by the way is a problem in itself. The provinces need to stop seeing elections as getting more money from Ottawa. Fiscal responsibility is social programs job security. Without it there is no money for social programs.

The sky will not fall if Quebec separates. Take a look at the map. Quebec is huge. Alaska functions fine apart from the US just as the Eat Coast would if Quebec were to separate. Nevertheless, I still believe we are stronger together than we are apart.

They key word here is listen. We need to listen to each other and respect each other’s opinions. We don’t have to agree on everything. That’s unrealistic. But if we maintain the status quo and let each party have a veto then we don’t steam roll ahead in extreme directions.

The only thing we really need to fix right now is the non confidence vote. MP’s should have free votes. If the government proposes a bill and that bill is defeated then there shouldn’t be another election until the time is up. That way we have a perfect democracy. The politicians’ hands are tied which for the public interest is a good thing.

Now as far as my concerns go, every person and party has good and bad, Harper included. The Liberals created massive debt when they were in power. It’s not the government’s job to create employment. It’s the government’s job to protect human rights as they collect taxes and administer a set of democratically chosen social programs like the police and the fire department. All social programs are not evil.

Hospitals, schools, they are not evil. Nor is housing. George Bush was evil. After pimping the church and spending billions on a war that was based on a lie the economy collapsed under his catastrophic leadership. Then he spends billions on the banks but not a penny on all the families who lost their homes. I am very concerned about fiscal responsibility but personally I rather spend tax dollars on housing, hospitals and schools than banks, fake stocks and wars driven by oil resulting in the occupation and oppression of foreign countries.

The good news is that maybe the new coalition will be less trigger happy to privatize Canada Post and everything else under the sun so we don’t follow the States path of unregulated self destruction.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

India’s 911




I’ve held back on commenting on the Terrorism in India recently because I’m not really sure what to make of it. My first reaction is skepticism. With the stark reality of the false flag quest of the CIA nothing would surprise me any more.

My position is pretty simple. Terrorist attacks on civilians is heinous. False flag attacks on civilians is even worse. Once again we find ourselves stuck in a dilemma of not being able to believe anyone because both sides are untrustworthy.

I don’t have the same fear and animosity towards the Muslim faith as big brother to the south does. Their objection is not just homophobic it is down right suspicious. Sleeping with the Taliban until they gave the Oil pipeline contract to an Argentina firm says it all. Nothing the Americans have to say after that has any credibility whatsoever.

And that goes for MI6 as well who were caught giving false information to the media about Iraq. MI6 and the CIA are corrupt. That’s all there is too it. Now, having said that in no way implies that they are the only corrupt players on the field. Not at all. It just means we can’t believe a word that comes out of their mouths.


Calling the recent attacks India’s 9/11 to me is another red flag. If 9/11 was suspicious then India’s 9/11 will be suspicious too. Coming out hard against Pakistan at this point in time is also very suspicious. The CentGas pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan was to go to Pakistan. One minute they’re in bed with them, the next minute they are in a media war with them. It is downright suspicious.

I met someone today who spent part of their childhood in Iran because their father was helping to develop the oil resources there. His goal was to see the profits of the oil sales go directly to the government the oil was found in. That makes sense. How would we like someone come to our country and sell our natural resources. The problem with the American oil companies is greed. They want to exploit these countries in a twisted form of Imperialism and as soon as the country says no they declare war. Dirty deals.

I oppose Islamic extremism just as much as I oppose Christian, Jewish or Communist extremism. It’s just interesting the media war is pinning this on Pakistan's Military Intelligence called ISI. One article claims the ISI is America's Trojan Horse a de facto proxy of the CIA. Pakistani Intelligence has, since the early 1980s, worked in close liaison with its US and British intelligence counterparts.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20081129&articleId=11217

Is there any terrorist in the world the CIA hasn’t trained? We need to stop and examine Operation Northwoods and Operation Gladio. Then we need to stop endorsing the CIA. Period.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Surrey Seniors Targeted



Where is our self-respect? The provincial government has targeted seniors and are robing them of shelter. This as we prepare to host the Olympics and give subsidies to the rich? That is revolting.

This is the man who gave himself an obscene raise and a gold plated pension after he closed Riverview and put all the mentally ill on the street. This is the man who gave himself a second obscene raise and handed out gold medals with his head on them to construction workers working on the Olympic site right before he put these seniors on the street. This man has diminished us. By electing him we as a people are diminished.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

CentGas - Afghanistan’s Oil War



I’m going to clarify a few links in my last post just to drive the point home. I just posted the links as I was rushing off to work this morning. The revelation is the quest to build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan called CentGas short for Central Asia Gas Pipeline and it reeks with Bush administration conflict of interest.

The CentGas pipeline was to connect Turkmenistan, a new country north of Iran, formed from the former Soviet Union, with Pakistan. The reason the US has interest is because of the US Oil company UNOCAL and Halliburton, which was headed by Dick Cheney at the time.


This article itemizes the players involved in the Afghanistan Oil Pipeline:
http://pashalaw.blogspot.com/2007/12/who-is-hamid-karzai.html

Condoleezza Rice was a former member of the board of Chevron? Chevron bought out UNOCAL in 2005: http://www.pipelinedubai.com/press/2005/pr_05_0690.htm

ENRON conducted the feasibility study for the CentGas deal? ENRON were contributors to Bush’s campaign fund? http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/oilwar1.html

No wonder they promoted Enron’s official book cooker to the Pentagon’s official book cooker.

Any ways. The point is the timeline. Not only did the CIA train the Taliban to fight the Soviets during that war, not only did the Bin Laden family provide start up money for the Bush family’s defunct oil company in Texas, but up until four months before 911, Texas oil barons were wooing the Taliban to win the contract to build the pipeline.
http://grant-montgomery.blogspot.com/2008/09/us-and-nato-forces-in-afghanistan.html

The point is, everything went wrong when the Taliban awarded the pipeline contact to a firm in Argentina instead of the US. Then… Abracadabra… war. All of a sudden all the bad things the Taliban did mattered and the US embarked on a crusade to liberate the oppressed. Only the oppressed didn’t matter as long as the Taliban gave the US the pipeline contact. That seems to be the real issue on the table.

Another war of deception fought over money:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridas