CSIS Spying on Canadians

I’m having a lot of trouble accepting these terrorist charges coming from CSIS in Canada. This latest batch claims everyone that knew one of the suspects said no way it must be a case of mistaken identity. The Toronto 18 did look like entrapment and the kids were held a long time before their “confessions” came out.

The third tower fell in New York when no planes hit it. It collapsed into it’s own blue print exactly like a controlled demolition. It didn’t tip over. It fell at freefall speed. This means the pressure from the top collapsing didn’t force the subsequent floors to collapse. They all collapsed at the same time just like a controlled demolition. Thermite was found in the rubble.

Operation Northwoods was real. President Johnston recalled the air support for the USS Liberty when it was attacked in the Mediterranean claiming he wanted that vessel sunk. His own people. False flag events do occur.

What if Canada’s watered down version of a false flag event was to falsely accuse someone of a terrorist plot, then catch them before it was implemented. That way you could raise public fear without killing innocent people. Kinda like that CIA agent who was caught trying to do a terrorist act in New York with a car full of fireworks and a toy clock.

The problem is the possibility. Like accusing one of sexual abuse falsely. Even making the accusation opens the door to the possibility the accusation might be true.

I’m having a lot of trouble believing these allegations because we know secret service agencies release things to the media and are obsessed with propaganda. Look at MI 6’s Operation Mass Appeal. They were caught red handed giving false information to the media about Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction to gain public support for an invasion.

Another real concern is CSIS using a false terrorist allegation to rationalize gaining more access to spy on people’s e-mail. This whole case was based on intercepted private e-mail obtained without warrants. “They monitor all internet communications and suspicious communications are flagged when certain key words pop up. Kinda like how in a spy movie the agency is notified when people atart saying the words bomb on the phone. Only for them to hear those key words they have to be monitoring the phone or e-mail in the first place.

Something they adamantly denied right after in another press release which it totally suspicious and complete bullshit. They said we don’t spy on people’s e-mail and if we do it’s by accident. Yeah right. This is really serious. The water is getting hot and all us frogs don’t notice it.

Which leads us to the smear campaign against the founder of Wiki Leaks. I find it very suspicious. Obviously if someone commits rape that is a serious offense. Yet we have seen the CIA’s smear campaign against many people who have spoken out against them in the past. Gary Webb, Cele Castillo and many others.

And I have no doubt the CIA would use assets in other countries like Canada or Holland to perpetuate their propaganda. Hijacking a plane with box cutters in 9/11 was not believable. Neither is perpetuating that myth in Holland.

CIA Agent Faisal Shahzad

NYC bomb suspect had Taliban 'direction' - Bullshit. He did not say he was from a Muslin lawless sate because Muslim extremists are obsessed with the Koran and Muslin law. They do not support lawlessness. What's more likely is that this headline is to distract us from this other headline in today's news: Oil fix fails as oil hits Alabama beaches.

The CIA trained the Taliban to fight the Russian invasion. Halliburton and the Texas oil companies were wining and dining the Taliban trying to win the contract for the oil pipeline through Afghanistan called CentGas. When the Taliban ended up awarding the contract to an Argentina firm named Bridas, all of a sudden we were at war with Afghanistan. After the invasion of Afghanistan the contract was given back to UNOCAL and Halliburton which was tied to Dick Cheney. Halliburton is connected to BP and the current oil spill.

-------------------------------------------------------------------



Take a good look. This is what a CIA Agent looks like. Since the growing number of people including architects still question and doubt the official story behind 9/11 the CIA are bound and determined to continue their Operation Mass ReAppeal. They keep making up bogus terrorist attacks and saving us from them to justify their existence and to use propaganda into lulling the public into questioning the concerns of 9/11.

Remember Operation Mass Appeal was MI 6's media blitz that sent false information to the media about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction. Dr. David Kelly was the British weapons inspector in Iraq at the time who leaked out MI6's plan to the press. He died of a suspicious suicide. Then MI6 claims he was murdered by Iraqi's intelligence because they were mad he was inspecting their weapons. But wait, that doesn't make sense. No matter how mad he could possibly have got them in the past, he was telling the world MI 6 was lying about Iraq's WMD. Iraq would want him alive to do that.

I just just don't believe a word that comes out of the CIA's mouth any more for good reason. Operation Northwoods. The USS Liberty. A pattern of lies, a pattern of false flag attacks. The boy who cried wolf then keeps paying people to dress up as wolves to pretend he wasn't lying.

Think about it. Palestinians shooting hand held rockets into Israel and a car load of fertilizer and fireworks with a toy clock did not bring the third tower or the twin towers down in a controlled demolition.



Psychotic extremists hiding in caves with goats did not plant thermite in the third tower or the twin towers and bring them down in a perfectly controlled demolition where they collapse into their own footprint at free fall speed. Liars. Instead of feeding us bullshit why don't you cap the leaking oil well that was caused by taking short cuts and stop blaming terrorists for Halliburton and the Oil companies' terror.

A CSIS Scam

Toronto bomb plotter gets 14 years: http://news.ca.msn.com/canada/cp-article.aspx?cp-documentid=21505752

What's up with that? If 9/11 was an inside job was this just a scam? Who would want to bomb the headquarters of CSIS? They are insignificant. If someone did ever bomb the TSE or CSIS the prime suspects would be CSIS.

Operation Northwoods, Operation Gladio, Operation Mass Appeal ... the list goes on. If MI6 and the CIA are corrupt, how can CSIS not be? What about Canada's Guantanamo bay? Torture to get fake false flag confessions. At one point I would have thought that would be absurd but now it looks much more likely.

Don't get me wrong. If the guy (kid) really was planning to blow people up that is very serious. It's just that given the obvious 9/11 inconsistencies which expands to England, Iraq and India, I'd have to say the whole thing is very suspicious. Like I said if CSIS or the TSE were ever bombed, CSIS would be the prime suspects.

Here we have a kid who gets 14 years for an alleged plan while the real villains who did the air India bombing all walked. Maybe Saad Khalid is Canada's own Hurricane Carter: www.youtube.com/watch?v=few4kiKjNzw

Iran Revisited

I find the recent protest over the elections in Iran interesting: http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&showbyline=True&date=true&newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20090614%2firan_election_090614

Was there voter fraud or was the CIA just unhappy with the results of the election? Sometimes it’s hard to tell. In 1953 the CIA paid people to start protests and led a coo against the democratically elected leader and plant a US friendly one in his place under Operation Ajax.

http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/041600cia-timeline-pix.14.html

http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/041600iran-cia-index.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejNk7VD0ru0

Are these demonstrations history repeating itself?

Suspicious Suicides

There have been a long line of suspicious suicides surrounding the CIA and MI6 lately. I will cite three.

Garry Webb:
http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/09/bourne-supremacy.html

Barry Jennings: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2009/01/barry-jennings-suspicious-death.html

David Kelly: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1131243/PETER-OBORNE-Five-years-Hutton-STILL-havent-told-truth-war-based-lies.html

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1236026913411489909

http://dr-david-kelly.blogspot.com/



Lord Hutton? You mean Lord Vader. Hutton Inquiry, 9/11 Commission, Warren Commission. Same papers different pile.

I encourage people to become familiar with these cases. It is also prudent to become familiar with the Arkansas case where a corner knowingly falsified a murder claiming it was a suicide: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/10/arkansas-train-deaths.html

The Dark Knight

I finally saw Dark Knight with Heath Ledger. He sure did an amazing job playing the villain. I’m saddened by his death and the mysterious circumstances surrounding it. I think his best role was in A Knight’s Tale. He was great in that too.

I’m not much into Batman, Superman or Spiderman movies but Dark Knight intrigued me. The whole concept of wearing down a good person until they fall to the dark side was interesting. What would we do if we lost everything we loved? Become bitter? Turn vindictive or malicious? I still contend that torture is wrong. That is the first line that should not be crossed if our ideals aspire to something higher than that of our enemies.

It’s interesting how actors can play such contrasting roles. Russell Crowe in Gladiator and in A Beautiful Mind are prime examples of two very different characters played by a talented actor. Similar to Heath Ledger’s roles in Dark Knight and A Knight’s Tale.

Another interesting character is Mel Gibson. His pinnacle role was clearly Braveheart. Courage, loyalty, fidelity. Those are noble characteristics. His anti semetic comments in a drunken tirade was somewhat shocking after his riveting job directing the Passion of Christ. Then the recent news of how he’s leaving the mother of his six children for some playboy lingerie bimbo. What’s with men and silicone anyways?

I was commenting on how that really didn’t fit in with his loyalty and fidelity in Braveheart. Then my daughter reminded me of the role he played in What Women Want. A funny movie but a somewhat less idealistic character. I had to concur that these are just actors playing roles. Interesting indeed. I still think it’s good to aspire to something higher.

When I think of Dark Knight I think of that MI6 director John Scarlett who was granted knighthood just for being MI6. Somewhat suspicious when we see MI6’s role in Operation Mass Appeal planting false evidence in the media against Iraq to justify an invasion. Then there was MI6’s botched false flag operation in Iraq:
http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/12/anarchy-in-uk-revisited.html

Somehow I just see the MI6 as dirty and the appointment of John Scarlett to Knighthood simply as the Dark Knight: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/09/missing-link.html

Do not go gentle into the night. Rage, Rage against the Dark Knight.

Anarchy in the UK Revisited

http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/10/anarchy-in-uk.html

Just to clarify let’s step outside the box and contemplate what this really means. Two under cover British military personnel were caught red handed at an Iraqi checkpoint dressed as Arabs with a car filled with guns and explosives.

Don’t ya think that looks and sounds a little suspicious? Two white guys dressed as Arabs wearing fake beards. It looked suspicious enough from a distance for a checkpoint to require a closer look.
Best case scenario is that they were going undercover and trying to make contacts with some terrorists to arrest them. However, that just doesn’t pass the test of believability. Two white Brits dressed as Arabs wearing fake beards want to fool some terrorists into thinking they are one of them. Not likely. It’s just not believable.

As soon as the terrorist got a closer look or heard them speak, they would know they were not local terrorists. That best case scenario doesn’t make sense. Yet we know they were on a mission and that they were under cover. We know that the British Military supported their mission because they broke them out of jail without a trial and called it a rescue. They did exchange fire with the Iraqi police, the ones they put in power and were supposed to be helping and ended up killing one of the police officers.

All because they didn’t want to tell them what their mission was. I’m sorry but all conspiracies aside, I don’t see any other plausible explanation as to what their mission could possibly have been. It clearly looks like they were going to shoot someone and blow something up dressed as Arabs and blame it on terrorists. There is no other plausible explanation. It fits with Operation Northwoods and Operation Gladio.

This is really serious. We as a people are sleeping. We either don’t want to know or are too afraid to know. We all like to criticize the Germans for not standing up to Hitler but are we really any different? Hitler used false flag attacks to gain control of his senate and fool public opinion: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/09/history-of-faked-military-attacks.html

Here’s the math: http://unblinkered.blogspot.com/2005/09/picture-update-two-british-undercover.html

Tell me, is it apathy, stupidity or fear? Why are we so blind?

UK Invasion

No I’m not talking about the Beatles. Much: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yq372R4Ts
I’m talking about England in Iraq. We all remember Tony Blair’s lovefest with George Bush: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nupdcGwIG-g

Somewhat pathetic so it was. He received the congressional I’ve blown bush badge for standing by Bush’s side as they invaded Iraq under false pretense and sent in MI6 to launch Operation Mass Appeal by giving false information to the media. They were all caught red handed: http://www.peacecandy.com/gwbush/remindus/

Don’t forget the purpose of MI6: "The purpose of MI6 is to defend the economic well being of the UK." And don’t forget the recruiting question of MI6: "Where do Britain's best long-term interests lie? Washington, Brussels or Moscow?"

The bottom line is despite the propaganda, it’s all about the money. Human rights have nothing to do with it. They didn’t care about Saddam Hussein using American chemical weapons on Iran. They didn’t care about all the bad things the Taliban did when they were going to let UNOCAL build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan. They don’t care Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are the only two countries left on the planet that still don’t let women vote in elections. It’s all about the money. Don’t let them tell you any different.

Tony Blair wondered if he should stay or if he should he go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1vwKZiDsY4&NR=1 He left but he forgot to take his MI6 propaganda machine with him. Canada does not need Iggy.

Michael Ignatieff MI6’s shining star

Think about it. This guy supports torture and has the audacity to pretend the wars for oil actually have anything to do with human rights. This is a MI6 propaganda shining star.

Remember MI6 gave false information to the media about Iraq. Remember MI6 actively participated in Operation Gladio in Europe which was Operation Northwoods implemented. Remember MI6 participated in a foiled false flag event in Iraq: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/10/anarchy-in-uk.html

The truth is MI6 is connected to Oil: http://www.mathaba.net/data/sis/mi6-oil.html

"SIS (often known as MI6) provides HMG with a global covert capability to promote and defend the national security and economic well-being of the United Kingdom."

http://www.sis.gov.uk/output/about-us.html

The purpose of MI6 is to defend the economic well being of the UK.



Historian Andrew Roberts has written about his own experience of being approached in 1987 to join MI6. In the interview he was asked "Where do Britain's best long-term interests lie? Washington, Brussels or Moscow?" Obviously Tony Blair thought Britain’s best long term economic well being resides in Washington. Thus his support for the Invasion of Iraq under false pretense which his intelligence agency helped promote. http://www.mathaba.net/data/sis/mi6-sd36.shtml

Obama to send 10,000 more troops to Afghanistan

http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=7d5b501a-bcab-4fa7-a30f-36bb15573525

This is kind of what Jesse Ventura meant when asked what he thought of the two party system in the US. He responded by saying, "I think it’s great. We have one more candidate on the ballot than Communist Russia." He does have a point. He also compared the two party system to being offered a drink. What would you like to drink, Coke or Pepsi? Well let’s see. They’re both soft drinks, they’re both colas, they taste a little bit different but all in all they are basically the same.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m thrilled Obama was elected. However my concerns over the existing CIA and Pentagon officials remains the same. Pulling out of Iraq is good. Obsessing over Osama is suspicious. With all the legitimate 911 discrepancies we need to first determine if Osama bin Laden really did it before we put him in front of another kangaroo court or let the CIA torture him until we get another bogus confession.

Operation Northwoods was a historical disgrace. I sure don’t think a plane made those perfect diagonal theremite cuts on the load bearing beams we see in 911 photos. Who did those? Why does the bin Laden confession video not look like bin Laden? We need to answer that before was start or continue another war.

It’s really suspicious that the CIA keeps creating these boogie men. Don’t get me wrong I do believe boogie men exist. I’m just skeptical as to why so many are created by the CIA. In 1953 the CIA overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran shortly after the CIA was formed: http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=ejNk7VD0ru0&feature=channel

.

They were responsible for the subsequent mess in Iran. They put Sadam Hussein in power in Iraq and trained Osama bin Laden and the Taliban to fight the Soviets. The CIA want a reason to exist so they keep creating these boogie men so they can save the day in one manufactured emergency after the other.

The CIA needs to stop fucking around with other countries:

http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=geQG0ptFaS0&NR=1

Better yet, the CIA needs to be disbanded. Period.
There never was any good in them.

As for sending more troops to Afghanistan, we need to investigate 911 before we continue that mission. Canada should pull it’s troops out of Afghanistan and put them in Darfur where they belong.

CSIS and the Media

Can we believe anything that CSIS says: http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=e70b88b4-09f3-4d03-85a1-c056123d718c

MI6 were caught giving false information to the media: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article839897.ece

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/apr/08/uk.iraq

It’s all very suspicious so it is.

If the CIA is corrupt and if MI6 is corrupt what does that make CSIS?

The CIA and the Media

This was a very interesting article by Carl Bernstein published in the Rolling Stone describing the CIA’s use and control of the media: http://www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php

The Frogman Affair

Interesting book that came out after Gary Webb’s articles connecting the CIA to the crack epidemic of the /80’s called Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press. This book takes Webb’s findings one step further and shows that the CIA and Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, William French Smith knew about the drug for arms trade: http://books.google.ca/books?id=s5qIj_h_PtkC

The Frogman raid took place in San Francisco. The DEA caught Meneses’ men unloading 200 kilograms of cocaine. The DEA then went to the home of Julio Zavala one of Meneses’ lieutenants where they found and seized $36,800 cash.

"Hitz’s report stated 'At OGC’s (the CIA’s Office of General counsel) request the US Attorney General has agreed to return the money to Zavala.' The CIA’s Inspector General said the Agency wanted the money returned 'to protect an operational equity i.e. a Contra support group in which it (the CIA) had an operational interest.'" (page 390)
http://books.google.ca/books?id=s5qIj_h_PtkC

Ivan Gomez the CIA’s man in Costa Rica said he was "there to ensure the profits from the cocaine went to the Contras and not into someone’s pocket." (page 391)

In 1982 the CIA signed a memorandum with Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, William French Smith freeing the Agency from any requirement to report allegations of drug trafficking involving nonemployees. Who were described by Hiltz as paid and non-paid "assets, pilots who ferried supplies to the Contras as well as contra officials and others."

It appears the agreement with the Justice department was modified in 1986 after the flow of Congressional funds to the Contras had been restored to stop paying assets who were known to be involved in the drug trade. The agreement officially ended in 1995. (page 391)

"In March, 1998, the CIA Inspector General testified that there had existed a secret agreement between CIA and the Justice Department, wherein "during the years 1982 to 1995, CIA did not have to report the drug trafficking by its assets to the Justice Department." http://www.heart7.net/cia-doj-agreement2.html

Body of Lies

The movie Body of Lies was OK. Leonardo DiCaprio did a great job but the movie itself is fiction and propaganda. Leonardo DiCaprio plays a friendly American: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/08/friendly-american.html

Well as friendly as a CIA Agent can be when their career is based on murder and deception. The character he plays seems to care about people unlike his superior in the movie. Russell Crowe was way better in Gladiator but once again it shows his talent as an actor playing different roles. He was great in A Beautiful Mind as well.

However, the character he plays in this movie is your typical arrogant I don’t care about anyone else on the planet and I’m not even going to pretend I care type. His acting was good but it’s hard to like a character like that. The movie was total propaganda as it glorified the CIA and demonized the entire Muslim religion.

The movie came right out and implied that the Muslim religion wants to either convert or kill all infidels. That's just plain hate propaganda. Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses, they have missionaries. I don’t see to many Muslim missionaries out there. You might see a few handing out stuff in a city centre but it’s pretty low key.

As far as killing all infidels I think they get bent out of shape when they feel threatened or when you invade their country. True they don’t allow Christian missionaries but neither do the Jews in Israel and we surely don’t invade them because they want to preserve and protect their religious heritage. Muslims and Jews both believe in the Old Testament which states "Vex not the stranger that sojourneth with thee." Muslims and Jews who want to wipe the other group off the face of the earth are not adhering to their religious teachings.

The movie was basically more Iraq propaganda. There’s one scene where DiCaprio gets defensive explaining why he referred to the situation in Iraq and not the war with Iraq. He refers to the unfortunate situation where suicide bombers are killing people in the market but fails to mention a word about how the US invaded and destabilized Iraq based on a series of lies. There were no WMD and the MI6 planted that and false information about nuclear weapons in the media: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/apr/08/uk.iraq

The movie didn’t mention a word about those lies. Of course we know that the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with 911. Even Bush admitted that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9QxNiKsYFg&feature=related

The movie didn’t mention a word about all the False flag murders in Operation Northwoods, the USS Liberty and in Operation Gladio. Not a word. The movie did portray a VERY watered down false flag act when they took bodies from the morgue and planted a bomb in a US embassy and blew it up blaming an innocent man hoping a real terrorist would contact him so they could catch the real terrorist.

Using bodies from the morgue is very different that what they did in Operation Gladio and proposed in Operation Northwoods. However, the character Leonardo DiCaprio plays is very likeable. He does seem to care about people and he even falls in love with an Arab Muslim woman from Iran working in Jordan.

All in all I think the acting was very good, the story behind the scenes was good but the overwhelming propaganda disappointing.

Anarchy in the UK

This one my daughter gave me. I cannot believe the media let it slide. Remember MI6, the British Secret Service got caught giving false information to the media about Iraq’s WMD and Nuclear arsenal before the US invasion called Operation Mass Appeal:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article839897.ece

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/apr/08/uk.iraq

That fact shows that England and their secret service was clearly in on the invasion of Iraq under false pretense. Their mission to give the media false information about Iraq to justify an invasion has been documented. So lets take that fact and add it to the next piece of the puzzle.

http://unblinkered.blogspot.com/2005/09/two-british-undercover-soldiers.html

http://www.infowars.com/articles/iraq/basra_agent_provocateurs.htm

Two under cover British Soldiers dresses as Arabs driving a civilian car packed with weapons and explosives were stopped by an Iraqi police checkpoint and they exchanged fire with the Iraqi police before surrendering. Remember that this is the police force that the US and British have put in place and are supposed to be training and supporting. Why would under cover British soldiers fire on them?

Why would under cover British Soldiers be dressed as Arabs driving a civilian car packed with explosives? Why did they refuse to tell the Iraqi police what their mission was I.E. why they were dressed as Arabs with a civilian car packed with explosives? How is that a mission?

Instead of letting the under cover agents under go a fair trail for their crime, the British military broke them out of jail and called it a rescue. A rescue from who? The people you have placed in power? This is insane.

Were they on an under cover mission to find insurgents or were they on a false flag operation to create violence and blame it on Iran to justify invading Iran? We will likely never know. MI6 has lied to us before so we can’t trust what they tell us. For all we know Iran could be building a nuclear arsenal. These false flag operations however do nothing to build the credibility of the US or the UK.

This false flag propaganda machine is completely evil. There is no honour in it. It is a war based on a lie. I am amazed that England and the MI6 has bought into these kind of absurd operations. I guess it’s to be excepted when both secret services have degenerated into profiting from the sale of drugs and guns. Profiting from the war machine is clearly big business. Bad business but bug business nonetheless.

Bush Binladen CIA

Arbusto Energy was an oil company in Texas formed by George W. Bush in 1977. James R Bath made an investment of $50,000 while representing Salem bin Laden of the Saudi Binladin Group: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbusto_Energy

"even as the hijacked planes smashed into the World Trade Center, the Carlyle Group was holding its annual investor conference. Shafig Bin Laden, brother of Osama Bin Laden, attended"

George H.W. Bush Meets bin Laden's Brother on Sept 10. 2001 at Carlyle Group: http://www.wanttoknow.info/030316post

The Carlyle Connection: http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,4288516-103680,00.html

Bin Ladens allowed out of U.S. after 9-11: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34405

"Michael Springmann, formerly chief of the visa section at the US Embassy in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, claims that he rejected hundreds of suspicious visa applications, but the C.I.A. officer overruled him and ordered the visas to be issued. Springmann protested to the State Department, the Office of Diplomatic Security, the F.B.I., the Justice Department and congressional committees, but in vain."

"Springmann observed that 15 of the 19 people who allegedly flew airplanes into buildings in the United States got their visas from the same CIA-dominated consulate in Jeddah. As a special favor to residents of Saudi Arabia (including non-Saudi citizens), applicants for non-immigrant visas can apply at private travel agencies and receive their visa through the mail. During the months following the 9-11 attack, 102 applicants received their visas by mail, 2 more were interviewed, and none were rejected."

http://911review.org/Wiki/CiaVisasForPatsies.shtml

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw6YHij-aCU

How the CIA created Osama bin Laden: http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/CIA_Created_Osama.htm

And Saddam Hussein too: http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html

Arkansas Train Deaths

Speaking of corruption in both the Democrat and the Republican parties let’s take a look at the Arkansas train deaths. This one’s pretty long and complicated but let’s start with two simple facts. First look at the CIA’s drug history trading guns for drugs to fund their expansionism and their overpowering denial of those facts: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/09/more-cia-drugs.html

Second let’s take a look at how the coroner intentionally falsified and covered up details about the deaths of Kevin Ives and Don Henry in Arkansas: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3Vy3Ov4A9g&feature=related

The lengthy conclusion is that the two boys stumbled across a CIA drug op and were murdered and placed on the train tracks to cover up their deaths. Although it is a long and far fetched conclusion the overpowering initial question rises as to why the coroner Fahmy Malak would falsify their death and other deaths in the area and why would Clinton support him. Why? http://www.idfiles.com/ttd.htm

Contra Band

Drugs for guns. Iran Contra:



Nicaragua contra:



US Military Distribution Points For Cocaine:



Can you see the pattern? Drugs for guns. The saga never stopped.

Venezuela National Guard:

In November 1993, Judge Robert C. Bonner, the former head of the DEA, appeared on 60 Minutes and alleged that the CIA had permitted literally a ton of cocaine to enter the United States: http://www.csun.edu/coms/ben/news/cia/ven/60m.html

Oh right, Judge Bonner is just another nutbar right?

Venezuelan General Indicted in C.I.A. Scheme: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B03E7D9143DF930A15752C1A960958260

More CIA Drugs

Since journalist Gary Webb’s articles and book Dark Alliance came out, establishing the connection between the CIA and crack cocaine, other key witnesses have collaborated the story.

Former LAPD narcotics officer Michael Ruppert testified that the LAPD has been selling drugs for a long time and working with the CIA to do it.

Former DEA Agent Cele Castillo confirmed the CIA drug smuggling operation at Ilopango Air force Base in El Salvador.

.

Drugs for weapons is nothing new. That is what the documented Iran Contra affair was all about. Oliver North was the famous fall guy for that Operation.

Crashed Jet Carrying Cocaine Linked to CIA: http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/09/crashed-jet-carrying-cocaine-linked-to-cia

CIA Torture Jet wrecks with 4 Tons of COCAINE: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/12/19210/608/933/420107

Drug corruption knows no political boundries: http://impiousdigest.com/index.php?Itemid=1&id=16&option=com_content&task=view

http://www.ciadrugs.com/

Operation Amadeus: http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/1998/06/cia_side.html

Operation Pegasus: http://www.scribd.com/doc/504761/The-Pegasus-Fileex-CIA-deep-cover-agent-Tatum-interviewed

Operation Watchtower - Affidavit of Edward P. Cutolo: http://www.wethepeople.la/cutolo.htm

The list goes on: http://www.wethepeople.la/drugs1.htm

And on: http://www.serendipity.li/cia.html#cia_drug_trafficking

CIA caught red handed in Miami. Said it was a mistake: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B03E7D9143DF930A15752C1A960958260

CIA Lawsuit: http://www.stewwebb.com/Legal%20Lawsuit%20Alleges%20FEMA%20Funded%20by%20Laundered%20Drug%20Profits.html

Bill Tyree: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/4481

Chip Tatum: http://www.voxfux.com/features/cia_bush_drug_trafficking_murder_pt1.html

Robert Gates: http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/101106_gates_trojan.html

The Missing Link

Scarlet O'hara is the Dark Knight. Rage against the darkness of the knight. Rage, rage against the dark knight:



Clearly MI6 is the missing link. Allegations of MI6 being involved in the drug trade along with substituted allegations of the CIA being involved in the drug trade set the stage:
http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/1998/06/cia_side.html

Then comes all the evidence that MI6 planted evidence against Iraq before the U.S. invasion:

http://www.democracynow.org/2003/12/30/scott_ritter_how_the_british_spy

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article839897.ece

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3227506.stm

You can see where I’m going with this but don’t believe me, believe the facts. They speak for themselves. Question: If the CIA dealt drugs and the MI6 did as well and the CIA endorsed operation Northwoods, did, would or could MI6 endorse something similar in the UK as well?

http://www.jamescasbolt.com/articles/london.html

Witness claims the bomb in London was under the train not left in a bag on the train. That means it was planted in advance: http://www.rense.com/general67/camb.htm

God save the Queen and God help the people.