Despite the fact that the U.S. sold chemical weapons to Iraq for them to use on Iran during that conflict. So it’s OK for the U.S. to sell Iraq chemical weapons but it’s not OK for Iraq to possess them? That doesn’t make sense. Nor does it make sense to occupy that country for thirty years after they were proven wrong.
All along we were told that Osama Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the attack on the Twin towers on 911. The Pentagon released a videotape of Bin Laden claiming responsibility for the attack: http://www.npr.org/news/specials/response/investigation/011213.binladen.tape.html
Only the videotape (Photo E) didn’t look like Bin Laden:
The eating with the right hand thing can be explained by the fact that seemingly members of the Islamic faith avoid using their left hand, yet the video doesn’t really look like Bin Laden and Osama Bin Laden officially denied responsibility for the attack:
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/
Bin Laden has admitted that he will kill civilians, which the Taliban’s recent murder of aid workers has demonstrated. Just because Bin Laden denies 911 does not mean he is innocent. After he declared war with the U.S. in 1998 he is clearly a prime suspect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnhJwxYsomw
Nevertheless, we simple cannot rely on the Pentagon since the day before 911 Donald Rumsfeld announced that "The adversary is closer to home. It’s the Pentagon bureaucracy. In fact it could be said that it’s a matter of life and death."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnQTcLHaMM&feature=related
The question remains: Who is responsible for 911?
Libby Davies and the Canadian people want to know: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r6DK_jTVcA&eurl
No comments:
Post a Comment