Chicago, Obama and the Olympic Bid

Chicago lost the Olympic bid. Who cares? The media is going on about how this is a huge set back and failure for the Obama administration. Whatever. Every Olympics can't be in the States. There will be another year. Half of us didn't want the Olympics in Vancouver for 2010. Montreal's Olympics back in 1976 were a financial disaster. Most of us in Vancouver didn't want to waste billions on a freeway while they put the elderly and disabled on the street.

He did the right thing by endorsing it but lets face it, Brazil has never held the Olympics and the States has. Not to mention the chance of terrorism or even the chance of a false flag act of terrorism if it was held in the States. Not to say that we bend to terrorists because we do not. We just need some time to get over the horrific Bush administrations arrogance to heal the hate the rest of the world has for America right now.

Everyone hates terrorism. Everyone opposes killing innocent civilians. After 911 we were all for kicking Afghanistan's ass. Then all of a sudden numerous inconsistencies arose. The bin Laden video that didn't look like bin Laden. The fall of the third tower when no planes hit it. The asbestos in the twin towers the port authority were required to remove. The oil pipeline in Afghanistan and the Texan oil companies with close ties to the Taliban trying to win that contract. Not to mention the declassification of Operation Northwoods and the whole can of worms false flag operations bring.

Obama is too supportive of the Afghanistan mission. That is not to say acts of terrorism is warranted because it's not. That's the fastest way to get the world united in kicking your ass. The discrepancies bring concern. If Afghanistan did 911 then that was wrong. If the CIA aided and supported 911 as a false flag attack then rot in hell. Either way, both are wrong.

The Sibel Edmonds story

Again the list of witnesses continues to gather despite so many falling victim to suspicious deaths. Sibel Edmons was hired to be a translator for the FBI after 911. She was translating documents, found somethings that concerned her and was fired for bringing them up. Her case went to trial and she was gagged but some facts are still open to be discussed and indeed so they should be. www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3ZXWVoHJFU

.

One of her allegations was that bin Laden worked for the U.S. right up until 911 and that the U.S. outsourced terror operations to al Quada and the Taliban for many years. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWbyZSnHFkc

.

Here is her website: http://www.justacitizen.com/

The Franklin Cover Up

This one is indeed so outrageous I shudder reading it. I've heard Alex Jones' allegations of bizarre things involving many prominent politicians and the Skull and Bones sect. It's hard to follow and I am somewhat defensive of Free Masonry since I am well aware they make covenants to keep lawful secrets not to keep the crimes of other free masons secret.

Yet I am somewhat less defensive of masonic break aways like the skull and bones who seem to have distorted the masonic rituals into something very bizarre indeed. The one point of interest I take from Alex Jone's exclusive on the Skull and bones is the involvement of prominent politicians is secret gatherings with gay prostitutes.

Now there is nothing earth shattering about homosexuality or prostitution. The interest arises when it's with politicians who venomously decry both. It is shall we say, somewhat ironic.

Nevertheless, this post is not about the Illuminati. Everything I know about the Illuminati I learned from Tomb raider. This post is about a child sex scandal involving Washington exposed by Russell "Rusty" Nelson after his arrest in 2005: www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_4wyBGVxug

The allegations are supported by pedophile victim Paul Bonacci who was awarded $1 million in damages for child abuse on February 19 1999 regarding his lawsuit with Larry King. NOT the same Larry King as the famous talk show host. Bonacci claimed the child sex ring was based out of Ouffutt Air Force Base near Omahah.

This case is documented in a former Nebraska state senator John DeCamp's book entitled The Franklin cover up. So this far reaching scandal involves a victim Paul Bonacci who was awarded damages for the abuse, former senator John DeCamp who witnessed and wrote about it and a photographer who spilled the beans. Those three witnesses give the conspiracy merit. Oh and BTW - it's also connected to the CIA.

The Freedom of Association

The freedom of association is a fundamental right. A democratic society that does not protect that right is not a democratic society. This is why I am really disappointed Obama's aide recently resigned because he singed a 911 petition several years ago.

There are many valid concerns that arise when examining 911 inconsistencies. Forbidding that discussion is wrong. Especially with the declassification of the Opertion Northwoods documents. Had those documents not been declassified, we would have all cried treason and not believed any of it was possible. Yet is was and history has recorded it. That is why we are morally bound to examine all suspects when investigating the cause and responsibility of the 911 attack.

Upon investigation I am what they call a truther. I do not believe the 911 commission report. That is my right. Some are debunkers. They passionately attempt to disprove every 911 concern. That is their right. I am very skeptical of the rageful denial that accompanies the debunkers obsession but others could argue the same about truthers.

I am told there are divisions within the truther movement. That is understandable and perfectly acceptable. When we examine crime scenes we develop theories and hypotheses. Some accept some theories, others don't. The key word here is theories. The proof has been tainted and we are at this time examining theories.

I am told that some truthers don't believe any planes were involved in any of the attacks and missiles were responsible for everything. I am told these people are shunned from the mainstream truther movement, if there is such a thing.

Personally, I believe a missile not a plane hit the Pentagon. We saw video clips of planes hitting the twin towers. I feel faking those videos is a stretch but concede that Donald Rumsfeld himself used the terms missiles at one point. Nevertheless, if some people want to believe and claim their theory is that missiles were used not planes that is their right. If someone wants to claim they think UFOs were involved, that too is their right. Hard for them to get credibility in the eyes of the public but it is their right nonetheless.

I do not believe it is the same as denying the Holocaust. History has recorded that horrific event. Likewise, history has recorded the death and destruction that resulted in 911. The 911 call of a man trapped in one of the towers after the plane hit comes to mind. Hearing his fear and shock right before and as the tower he was in collapsed was devastating. The death toll in the towers was tragic. There is no way to minimize that.

That is why blaming someone who didn't do it does not serve the people who were murdered on that day. I want to be clear that I do not support terrorism. I believe the doctrine of committing a suicide bombing against innocent people and somehow being rewarded in heaven by God is a doctrine of the devil. Nothing more, nothing less.

Yet I also believe that false flag attacks against your own people is just as bad if not worse. We need to talk about the declassification of the Northwoods documents. That is a significant part of history that needs to be addressed. Not only because it was how Hitler fooled the German people, but because it was something the director of the CIA proposed and would have been implemented had Kennedy not vetoed the operation.

That means we need to examine the CIA.

The president of the United States is sworn to uphold the Constitution. The CIA is not. They are sworn to protect state secrets at all costs. MI6 is mandated to promote the economic well being of the UK. They are not mandated and legally bound to protect individual rights and liberties. This needs to change.

"Gentlemen may cry peace peace, but their is no peace. The war is already began." Patrick Henry

George Bush Senior and Reagan's October Surprise

The October Surprise conspiracy relates to an allegation that the release of the Iranian hostages was delayed by the U.S. government to coincide with Ronald Reagan's election. Although the allegation was denied, many individuals stood by the allegation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_surprise_conspiracy_theory

In 1991 freelance writer Danny Casolaro claimed to be almost ready to expose the alleged October Surprise conspiracy, among others, when someone slashed his wrists, raising suspicions. He appeared to be traveling for his investigation. His death was ruled a suicide.

Danny Casolaro was also the one ready to expose "The Octopus." A vast interlocking network of criminal conspiracy that reaches right into the U.S. government: www.constitution.org/col/octocaso.htm

This is what Sarah McClendon had to say about George Bush Senor's involvement with Iran in the October Surprise Conspiracy that was a precursor to the Iran Contra Affair: www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=6201

Obama Adviser Resigns Amid Controvercy

Let's see. Here we have a democrat making snide comments about republicans not supporting the administration. Like that's anything new. It goes both ways. Oh but wait, his ultimate crime was signing a petition alleging government complacency in 9/11 attacks. www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/04/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5288607.shtml



The main stream refer to a petition claiming that Bush had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks as a "psychotic paranoia." I have to shake my head and bow it in shame. Operation Northwoods was psychotic alright but it wasn't paranoia it was real. One again we see the limits of Obama's omniscience. Caving in the to cover up. So much for free speech and the freedom of association.

Privatized Orgies at U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan

This is once again another example of what happens when you privatize public services and remove public accountability. We've already talked about the dangers of Blackwater the American's privatizing of their military.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=8474937

This story recently hit the news about contractors at the US embassy in Afghanistan. Most of the video clips are too raunchy for TV but the just of it is that the supervisors of the private security firm have been accused of being sexual deviants. Regularly holding drunken orgies for the past year and a half and demanding sex from new guards in exchange for promotions or preferred assignments.

Wait a minute. These are all men. Demanding sexual favors would mean gay sex. But I thought they didn't allows gays in the U.S. military. I guess that's another perk of privatization. Not that I have a problem with homosexuality. It's just demanding sex for promotions or preferred assignments whether it be gay or heterosexual is just plain wrong.

.

Somehow I don't think the Taliban would be doing this.

Michael Moore Save our CEO's

Gotta love Michael Moore:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhfzvzKm_xk

http://finance.sympatico.msn.ca/investing/news/businessnews/article.aspx?cp-documentid=20479183

Obama and Iran

Ya gotta admire Obama’s use of youtube and his attempt to reach out to Iran. Although Iran expressed a few valid concerns, Obama remains to be a breath of fresh air: http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&showbyline=True&date=true&newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20090320%2fIran_obama_090320

Iran’s Ayatollah claims that Obama is just a continuation of the Bush administration which I also cited in Jesse Ventura’s allegory of the two party system in America to Coke and Pepsi: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-to-send-10000-more-troops-to.html

The Ayatollah says Obama supporters talk and chant change but he doesn’t see any. However, during his speak, his supporters were chanting Death to America so it’s hard for the world to see any change on their part. It’s easy to criticize without offering anything positive in return: http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&showbyline=True&date=true&newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20090321%2fobama_iran_090321

Nevertheless, Iran’s leader did raise some very valid concerns. In response to Obama’s desire for better relations between the two countries he cites the historical fact that the United States supported Saddam Hussein during Iran’s war with Iraq. Supporting your enemy during a war would be a historical obstacle to over come. Especially when the United States sold Iraq chemical weapons to use on Iran during that war. Kind of like how the US sold Israel White Phosphorous to use on Gaza: http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2009/01/israels-mistakes-in-gaza.html

Iran also cited the United States downing of an Iranian airliner over the Persian Gulf in 1988. The US shot down an Iranian civilian airliner en route to Dubai while in Iranian territory:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

That is another valid concern. Although the US paid a settlement in an International Court, the US did not admit responsibility or apologize to the Iranian government. Admitting responsibility and apologizing would be another small step forward. However, I do think that it is realistic that the overzealous, shoot everything that moves US military did make a mistake in shooting down the airliner. I don’t think they would have done it on purpose. It would make more sense to shoot down their own or another country’s airliner and blame it on Iran to gain public support for invading Iran.

Invading Iran is the other issue on the table. The US and the CIA were quite active in meddling with Iran’s political history including their support of the Shaw and the establishment of an America friendly government: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejNk7VD0ru0

The US needs to stop meddling in the political aspirations of other countries. Although I do have concerns with an Islamic State just as I have concerns with a Jewish or Christian State, they do have a right to exist. Their passionate resolve to destroy Zionism is a valid concern, which I will address separately. Israel, like Iran has a right to exist.

Iran complained that the US keeps saying Iran supports terrorism and is seeking nuclear capabilities and denies that to be true. If that is false, then Iran has a right to be concerned with those allegations. Especially when those allegations are being used as a pretext for invasion. I’m sure some in Iran support terrorism. Especially when they chant Death to America. Some in Canada support terrorism although they are clearly in the minority. The Ayatollah publicly condemning terrorism is a step forward. Let’s hope that too is real and not just lip service.

If Iran was seeking nuclear capabilities to use against Israel that would be a valid concern. However, after MI6 was caught planting false information in the media about Iraq’s WMD in Operation Mass Appeal, it is hard for us to know who to believe and the US is the last country on earth to criticize another country for becoming nuclear capable. Historically the United States is the only country that has actually used nuclear weapons on another country. Civilians at that.

Although I do see Iran’s list of grievances as having some merit, I do see Obama as a clear step forward. Obama closed Guatemala bay. That was a proactive change he introduced. The bailout was following the Bush Administration’s lead but taxing the AIG executive bonuses was a step forward. Making Blackwater, the US privatized military accountable for war crimes was another clear step forward. Especially when McCain’s irreverent response was simply Bomb Iran.

The concern I have with the Obama administration is their failure to address the historical reality of false flag operations like Operation Northwoods and Operation Gladio. Zealously pursuing Bin Laden without a fair trial is wrong especially when the Bin Laden video did not look like Bin Laden and the list of 9/11 discrepancies is long and real. Before they zealously pursue the Taliban for giving the oil pipeline contract to an Argentina firm instead of an American firm, they need to address the 9/11 inconsistencies and the historical reality of CIA false flag operations. That however, might well be wishful thinking.

Obama’s mortgage relief plan

This makes a lot more sense then just handing over money to banks and rewarding them for foreclosing homes:

http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&showbyline=True&date=true&newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20090218%2fobama_homes_090218

Bush overpaid banks in bailout

"The Bush administration overpaid tens of billions of dollars for stocks and other assets in its massive bailout last year of Wall Street banks and financial institutions, a new study by a government watchdog says." Why is this not a surprise: http://finance.sympatico.msn.ca/investing/news/businessnews/article.aspx?cp-documentid=17543592

There's no one as Irish as Barack O'Bama

On the lighter side, this one’s kind of funny: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HplZ_taHXLM&NR=1
I do like Obama and recognize he is three million times better than the alternative. I just hope he stands strong and doesn’t give in to the former insanity on outsourcing and false flag ops.

Obama on Crack

Obama had some wonderful words about opposing outsourcing of American jobs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrgJ_xHemYg

Then he goes and appoints Republican Judd Gregg to head his commerce Department. Judd Gregg is an advocate of outsourcing: http://www.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/stories/2009/02/02/daily21.html

“The selection of Sen. Gregg completely contradicts what domestic manufacturers understand to be the president’s stated views on U.S. trade policy,” said council President Kevin Kearns. “Sen. Gregg has voted nonstop for bad trade deals that have shipped overseas thousands of factories and large numbers of high-wage jobs, helping to create today’s economic crisis.

“The choice of Sen. Gregg makes sense only if the president wants a secretary of Outsourcing,” Kearns said.

Judd Greg was an advocate for the invasion of Iraq: http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Judd_Gregg_War_+_Peace.htm

Obama signs order to close Guantanamo bay

Closing Guantanamo bay is a good thing. It is public knowledge that the CIA tortures suspects there. Bush vetoed a bill banning CIA torture. That was shameful. Let me reiterate, this is not a matter of torturing known terrorists to save innocent lives. This is the practice of torturing people to obtain false confessions to the CIA’s false flag operations. There was nothing there to be proud of. Before you dare mention the word Taliban read up on Unocal.

One of my daughter’s little racist friends from Texas was complaining that Obama is closing Guantanamo bay and "destroying everything". This coming from a huckle berry red neck kid who is a professed racist and Bush lover and works for less than 6 dollars an hour in one of the wealthiest states. My response to that is the only thing good that came out of Texas was the Dixie Chicks and look at how they were mistreated. OK that’s an exaggeration. A friend's daughter’s husband came from Texas and he was a great guy but he was black. There remains a lot of uneducated huckle berry racists in Texas and that is shameful.

I don’t agree with Obama on abortion but that is one issue. There are many other issues that I do agree with him on. There are many things that Bush did that were down right evil. If anyone is the AntiChrist it was Bush not Obama. Bush’s corruption goes back three generations. His grandfather funded Hitler. His father was a director of the CIA and tied to the drugs for guns deals that sparked the Crack epidemic in the US and Bush left a legacy of corruption from excessive privatization in the Prisons, Military (Blackwater), Energy (Enron), not to mention the torture and the false flag events. Did someone say reopen 9/11? Oh yeah, many of us did.

These are the best of times, they are the worst of times

As Charles Dickens once said these are the best of times, they are the worst of times. I am thrilled to see the changing of the guard for the protector of the United States constitution. One task that George Bush failed miserably at. I think Michael Moore said it well when he said George Bush’s last official duty should be offering himself a pardon for all the crimes he committed while in office.

I don’t want to rain on the parade. I’m thrilled with Obama’s inauguration and am filled with hope for a better day. Yet I remain overcome with sadness. Sadness for all the crimes committed that have been glossed over, denied, lied about and hidden. Sadness for all the death and murder that resulted in perpetuating those lies and sadness for them all to be swept under the carpet as Obama does the noble thing and reaches out to his political opponents. Indeed he is a better man than I am.

It was wonderful to see the masses attend the inauguration in Washington at the very spot Martin Luther King spoke at so many years ago. Oh happy day. Yet for me the sadness lingers. True Obama is speaking to a divided America but as he said not as divided as they were coming out of the civil war. Who on earth would want to reach out to someone who fought a war for the right to keep slaves?

Then there’s the story of a young man whose father never votes in elections and said he is going to make sure he votes in this election because he doesn’t want a black man to become president. That is so archaic it is embarrassing. The only way to stop a man like that is with the bullet or the ballot. The civil war stopped him with the bullet and today the ballot has risen supreme and stopped that kind of shameful insanity.

I like the commercial about hope: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BncNpB6IZ9I

Obama’s message was about choosing hope over fear:

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=6-zjho9SPgA

As my grief continues let’s look at some of the crimes committed that Michael Moore talked about. Election fraud. Excessive privatization resulting in excessive corruption in the privatized prisons, privatized military (Blackwater) and privatized Energy (Enron). Vetoing a bill stopping CIA torture. The long list of False Flag documentation within the CIA. Operation Northwoods. Operation Gladio. Those atrocities were history and should be remembered just as the holocaust is.

Then there was 9/11. We need to reopen 9/11. Extending the hand of fellowship to known murders is not the answer. A plane did not cause the thermite cuts in the load bearing beams of the twin towers. My sadness is for the atrocities that have been committed and are being glossed over in the name of peace at any price. The CIA is inherently corrupt. The death of Garry Webb and Danny Casolaro has not changed that. The CIA is a secret society whose purpose is murder to get gain.

http://video.google.ca/videosearch?hl=en&q=reopen+9/11&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa#

Obama and the North American Union

Clinton supported NAFTA. Obama supports the NAU:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcQE_HHlhoI

One step forward, three steps back. Republican or Democrat - Coke or Pepsi - Despite the debate not much different. http://finiansworld.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-to-send-10000-more-troops-to.html

Obama’s Youtube Channel

Normally the president of the United States addresses the nation in a state of the union Speech. When it came to Bush I couldn’t bear to watch him any more. I just had to turn it off. When Obama speaks people gather to listen. He now has his own youtube channel. Good on him: http://www.youtube.com/user/BarackObamadotcom

Obama’s Cabinet

I’ve never heard of this before. Obama cites Lincoln and wants to appoint some republicans to his cabinet in a genuine attempt to reach out to all Americans: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5167418.ece

That in my opinion is nothing short of amazing. That simply wouldn’t happen in Canada. Perhaps because of the way our system is framed with the non-confidence provision. It does however, appear to have been done before in the US on a token level. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3448362/Barack-Obama-to-appoint-Republicans-to-key-cabinet-roles.html

.

In his acceptance speech Obama pointed out that although the US is currently divided, they are not as divided as they once were. He was referring to the time when America was recovering from the civil war back when the States were fiercely divided over the issue of slavery. Personally I cannot comprehend how someone would fight a war for the right to keep slaves but that’s just me.

Nevertheless when Obama said he wanted to reach out to all Americans in that they are more than a bunch of red states and a bunch of blue states in that they are the United States, he promised to listen to his political opponents. That is unprecedented. What a breath of fresh air.

Now the tables are turned. 51% is still not a mandate. Although Obama won many more seats than McCain, the popularity vote wasn’t that far apart. Nevertheless, it’s great to see Obama take the higher road unlike his predecessor.

Why do I like these photos so much?


Bush showing Obama his new home.



Out with the old and in with the new. Three cheers.

Obama to send 10,000 more troops to Afghanistan

http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=7d5b501a-bcab-4fa7-a30f-36bb15573525

This is kind of what Jesse Ventura meant when asked what he thought of the two party system in the US. He responded by saying, "I think it’s great. We have one more candidate on the ballot than Communist Russia." He does have a point. He also compared the two party system to being offered a drink. What would you like to drink, Coke or Pepsi? Well let’s see. They’re both soft drinks, they’re both colas, they taste a little bit different but all in all they are basically the same.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m thrilled Obama was elected. However my concerns over the existing CIA and Pentagon officials remains the same. Pulling out of Iraq is good. Obsessing over Osama is suspicious. With all the legitimate 911 discrepancies we need to first determine if Osama bin Laden really did it before we put him in front of another kangaroo court or let the CIA torture him until we get another bogus confession.

Operation Northwoods was a historical disgrace. I sure don’t think a plane made those perfect diagonal theremite cuts on the load bearing beams we see in 911 photos. Who did those? Why does the bin Laden confession video not look like bin Laden? We need to answer that before was start or continue another war.

It’s really suspicious that the CIA keeps creating these boogie men. Don’t get me wrong I do believe boogie men exist. I’m just skeptical as to why so many are created by the CIA. In 1953 the CIA overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran shortly after the CIA was formed: http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=ejNk7VD0ru0&feature=channel

.

They were responsible for the subsequent mess in Iran. They put Sadam Hussein in power in Iraq and trained Osama bin Laden and the Taliban to fight the Soviets. The CIA want a reason to exist so they keep creating these boogie men so they can save the day in one manufactured emergency after the other.

The CIA needs to stop fucking around with other countries:

http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=geQG0ptFaS0&NR=1

Better yet, the CIA needs to be disbanded. Period.
There never was any good in them.

As for sending more troops to Afghanistan, we need to investigate 911 before we continue that mission. Canada should pull it’s troops out of Afghanistan and put them in Darfur where they belong.

Beware of Stupidity

This is what I like about the Province. They will print both side of an issue. People say I’m a dreamer. I am. In my fantasy world, free speech exists. People have the right to join and vote for the political party of their choice and they have the right to speak on an issue for or against.

The same day the Province ran my article in the editorial section they also ran a letter denouncing Obama in the letters section. They actually had two letters about Obama. One for: http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/letters/story.html?id=a92b94e9-3802-4b6f-b1d0-78ea3cd24b5f

And one against: http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/letters/story.html?id=941b2ccd-ca9b-4844-9f46-529fba972eb3

I will address the one against. It was titled Beware of Socialism. I shake my head at the bizarre stereotypes that rational beings subscribe to. They say democrats will tax and spend until there economy goes down the toilet and the republicans will save the economy with frugal spending and tax breaks for big business which will result in economic prosperity for all. This delusion is believed and repeated by many despite the fact that history has proven otherwise.



I’m not sure who produced this graph but the fact is everyone knows the economy was very bad under George Bush senior, got better for a while and got steadily worse under George Bush Jr until it completely and utterly crashed.

The ridiculous letter stated: "That once-proud nation will now be governed by ideals and a agenda that will, in four years, leave them with broken spirits, unfulfilled promises and an even larger deficit." This guy must be on crack because he’s living in a fantasy world of denial. He is describing the current state of affairs under 8 years of Bush’s leadership.

Even Canada's former United Nations envoy, Paul Heinbecker agrees. He described Bush’s tenure as catastrophic: http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=204c9ee8-e18e-4be7-82bf-09764b5c6325

The Beware of Socialism article implies that people who want affordable Medicare are evil socialists. If he took the time to look past his narrow minded stereotypes he would see and hear a great man rising up to heal the nation. Even if what he said was true and the Democrats would spend money to house the homeless and improve Medicare for all not just the rich, don’t you think it would be better to spend some money on that then billions after billions which ended in the trillions on a war that was based on a lie and bailing out banks after they foreclosed the homes of the masses.

Would this man call the preacher, Martin Luther King a socialist? Would he call Jesus of Nazareth a socialist who said inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these, ye have done it unto me. Ironic how extremists pimp the church to rationalize their greed and selfishness. Last I checked greed and selfishness are not elements of Christianity.

Open your eyes and stop pissing on the dream.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2M5iB1fkeM