The Freedom of Association

The freedom of association is a fundamental right. A democratic society that does not protect that right is not a democratic society. This is why I am really disappointed Obama's aide recently resigned because he singed a 911 petition several years ago.

There are many valid concerns that arise when examining 911 inconsistencies. Forbidding that discussion is wrong. Especially with the declassification of the Opertion Northwoods documents. Had those documents not been declassified, we would have all cried treason and not believed any of it was possible. Yet is was and history has recorded it. That is why we are morally bound to examine all suspects when investigating the cause and responsibility of the 911 attack.

Upon investigation I am what they call a truther. I do not believe the 911 commission report. That is my right. Some are debunkers. They passionately attempt to disprove every 911 concern. That is their right. I am very skeptical of the rageful denial that accompanies the debunkers obsession but others could argue the same about truthers.

I am told there are divisions within the truther movement. That is understandable and perfectly acceptable. When we examine crime scenes we develop theories and hypotheses. Some accept some theories, others don't. The key word here is theories. The proof has been tainted and we are at this time examining theories.

I am told that some truthers don't believe any planes were involved in any of the attacks and missiles were responsible for everything. I am told these people are shunned from the mainstream truther movement, if there is such a thing.

Personally, I believe a missile not a plane hit the Pentagon. We saw video clips of planes hitting the twin towers. I feel faking those videos is a stretch but concede that Donald Rumsfeld himself used the terms missiles at one point. Nevertheless, if some people want to believe and claim their theory is that missiles were used not planes that is their right. If someone wants to claim they think UFOs were involved, that too is their right. Hard for them to get credibility in the eyes of the public but it is their right nonetheless.

I do not believe it is the same as denying the Holocaust. History has recorded that horrific event. Likewise, history has recorded the death and destruction that resulted in 911. The 911 call of a man trapped in one of the towers after the plane hit comes to mind. Hearing his fear and shock right before and as the tower he was in collapsed was devastating. The death toll in the towers was tragic. There is no way to minimize that.

That is why blaming someone who didn't do it does not serve the people who were murdered on that day. I want to be clear that I do not support terrorism. I believe the doctrine of committing a suicide bombing against innocent people and somehow being rewarded in heaven by God is a doctrine of the devil. Nothing more, nothing less.

Yet I also believe that false flag attacks against your own people is just as bad if not worse. We need to talk about the declassification of the Northwoods documents. That is a significant part of history that needs to be addressed. Not only because it was how Hitler fooled the German people, but because it was something the director of the CIA proposed and would have been implemented had Kennedy not vetoed the operation.

That means we need to examine the CIA.

The president of the United States is sworn to uphold the Constitution. The CIA is not. They are sworn to protect state secrets at all costs. MI6 is mandated to promote the economic well being of the UK. They are not mandated and legally bound to protect individual rights and liberties. This needs to change.

"Gentlemen may cry peace peace, but their is no peace. The war is already began." Patrick Henry