WIPO Sold Out Free Speech

Well WIPO completely sold out free speech. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. After all their purpose is to make a profit. I should have known something was wrong when they assigned a Canadian corporate lawyer to be an arbitrator. If that isn't a shameful conflict of interest I don't know what is.



Darren's Ninja who is a specialist in the field knew the case law and knew Darren didn't have an exclusive right to the Darren Entwistle dot com domain. So Darren gets a red neck huckleberry rodeo clown who works on environmental law to apply for the domain. WIPO then assigns the case to a corporate whore for an arbitrator who violated all the existing case law and let him have the domain. http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2008/d2008-1534.html08-1534.html08-1534.html

That is really shameful. Daren has a legacy of lies and censorship. If he loses a labour decision like the Madame Pineau decision, he keeps appealing it until he wins. He lied and said Telus Idol didn't exist so we put it on youtube and he had that and many other videos he had no possible copyright claim on taken off youtube. Then there was the brown envelope.

The TWU acquired several confidential documents and Darren got a gag order preventing the contents of those documents to be made public because it would likely further poison the relationship between Telus and it's employees. Now he wants my web site taken off the Internet because it comes up number one on google when you search his name. He gets it. Everything Darren wants he gets.

Brian Canfield got in a fight with George Petty and fired him. Petty wanted to buy Clearnet for $1.9 billion and Canfield said no. Then Canfield brings in Darren and lets Darren buy Clearnet for $6.6 billion. Do the math.

It reminds me of a lady who saw Darren at a restaurant during the labour dispute. She was really upset with what he was doing to the company and the employees. She was so upset she took his picture at the restaurant. Yet that just wasn't enough. She was really angry and she wanted him to know. So she banged on the window so he could see her and she gave him the finger. Darren fired her along with many others but the question remains what could Darren have done to make her so angry? Now I understand.



As Darren celebrates yet another censorship victory he also celebrates the elimination of more jobs in Canada by closing COS in Calgary and Edmonton. Remember how he called us liars for claiming off shore call centres would reduce jobs in Canada? Who's the Liar now?