Libyan Intervention

British Prime Minister David Cameron warned that time is running out for the international community to intervene in Libya. Personally I wouldn't follow David Cameron into a bar not to mention another war for oil. Cameron is A) a freak and B) Untrustworthy.

He's the freak that wants to "liberate" every single publicly accountable program under the sun from "State" control. Schools, hospitals - everything. The freak show is all done under the guise of democracy when in reality it is clear that removing public accountability and handing all power over to private corporations removes our democracy and our autonomy.

"Every day Gadhafi is brutalizing his own people," he said. "Time is of the essence." As he spoke, Libyan government forces continued to bombard opposition positions as they advanced on the rebel capital, Benghazi, in a counteroffensive that has pushed rebels back 160 km in a week, far outpacing diplomatic efforts to impose a no-fly zone.

Gadhafi is fighting a coo. It is a civil war. People want him to leave while others don't. Like I said before, if the Falklands wanted to be free from British rule would David Cameron let them go or would he send in the Navy to crush that rebellion. Again.

I don't know all the bad things Gadhafi has done and is doing, but I do know England got involved in Iranian politics because they wanted their oil and convinced the Americans to get involved there which created quite a mess.

We know that England and America invaded Iraq for their oil and there were no weapons of mass destruction. That was a premeditated lie perpetuated in Operation Mass Appeal. We do know that Libya has oil and that Gadhafi has worked hard to prevent foreign ownership of that oil which England and America don't like. Look what happened to Afghanistan when the Taliban gave the contract for the oil pipeline UNICOL wanted to Bridas, and Argentina firm instead of an American firm.

Things are heating up in Saudi Arabia too as the people there are rebellion against their monarchy. Do we go to war with Gadhafi because we don't like him and then go to war with the Saudi people because we do like the monarchy they are rebelling against? It's all very problematic so it is. Perhaps conflicted would be a better word. It's a double standard.